Friday, December 3, 2010

FOUR LOKO FEATURE ARTICLE!!!

11LOKO30

Gettin’ Loco for Loko

Ban on caffeinated alcohol beverage brings mass controversy

By: Kervan Rikh


                Hey what are you doing tonight? Let’s get some Four Lokos,” sound the teens across the nation on a typical Friday night speaking of the product that is sweeping the nation. Colleges all over the nation are starting to ban this drink on their campus as students are being hospitalized and killed due to it.
In the New Jersey area, colleges such as Ramapo, Rider, Farleigh Dickinson, and Drew have recently banned the drink on their campuses. Colleges such as Ohio State and Michigan have also joined in this act to get Four Loko off the shelf. Ramapo has been the most aggressive in this ban after 23 intoxicated students and their guests were hospitalized, six of them had been drinking Four Loko. At Drew University in Madison, the college took a different approach that states having possession of the drink is a serious violation of the student code and students can face fines up to two-hundred fifty dollars and suspension from student housing. Another college, Ohio State, took a more subtle approach that allows students over 21 to possess and drink Four Loko unless state law prohibits it.
Although there have been several accidents and it seems like something to do immediately, the ban on Four Loko has caused controversy across America. Matt Manning of Michigan State says, “The drink is giving people exactly what they want and isn’t the problem but only a portion of a larger, dangerous cultural trend.” He is referring to the problem of underage drinking in America. The problem with Four Loko and underage drinking is that kids under the age of 21 starts consuming the drink and eventually cannot handle the amount of alcohol content and leads to dangerous nights. Mr. Manning closes his statement by stating, “Part of the reason the U.S. drinking age is 21 is because there’s a hope — and probably only a hope — that young people will be knowledgeable enough by the time they turn 21 to drink responsibly.”
The drink is potentially so dangerous because, “the caffeine masks the intoxicating and depressant effects of the alcohol and makes people feel more awake as they drink,” states David McBride, director of Student Health Services at Boston University. The drink, leaving people more intoxicated than they think, has brought many black-outs and hospital visits than most other drinks.
In a November 17th press conference, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that, “the consumption of beverages containing added caffeine and alcohol is associated with risky behaviors that may lead to hazardous and life-threatening situations.” The FDA did give warnings statements to the makers of Four Loko and implemented a ban that makes the drink in its current state to be removed from shelves nationwide by December 13th.
The drink is a fruity, alcoholic malt beverage that combines alcohol and caffeine to get a label of “blackout in a can.” Hubpages.com states, “Not just a power-house in calories, ‘Four Loko’ ranked fourth in sales growth in 2009.” This number is astonishing as it displays how many people want and care for this drink that is allegedly “liquid cocaine.”

Thursday, November 18, 2010

uhmmm feature articles

4loko being banned

Media Bias within Journalists

Dan Zak, Washington Post

1. Conservative- previous articles are all on him leaning towards the right, conservative, side. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/22/AR2010102202290.html?nav=emailpage)
2. Washington Post Journalist
3. "The country as a whole still can't deal with the gay thing. Not so in the pages of Cunningham."
4. tends to refer to homosexuals as gays several times in the articel above
5. ...?
6.
7.
8.
9.Post advertisements on other newspapers with conservative views
10.paints a picture of what the governments wants as he talks about his views of John Stewart
and Steven Colbert
11.
12.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Current Event: 11/3

News Story: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/how-the-gop-plans-to-run-_n_777678.html

What does article say about voters: That voters are frustrated with bills that run longer than a thousand pages and an opaque process run by leadership rather than through a transparent committee process.

Which states were votes contested: Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Washington

New problems in the house: "GOP leadership hopes to avert an insurrection from its extreme wing and unite the party under a common banner of strict adherence to the Constitution and sharp reductions in spending."

Summarize article: This is an article on how with the new Repbulicans and Democrat balance, the House of Representatives needs to balance and start making changes in a new way designed to respond to voter fustration. In the short term, cutting spending will be the first thing done to hamper the situation.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Media Bias

     These two articles show news on same sex marriages and how the liberals are more for it then than conservatives. In The Union Leader, a paper for the Boston region, refused to put the names of the two individuals getting married in the paper and the couple got help from high power Democrats to get their name put in. New Hampshire helped the couple posting this statement, "The Union Leader’s opposition to gays and lesbians being treated equally under the law is no secret to those of us that live in New Hampshire." While some are shocked about this, Michael K. Lavers who grew up in New Hampshire is not surprised stating, "It is not at all surprising the Union Leader decided not to publish this couple’s wedding announcement," said Lavers. "The newspaper’s conservative--and even anti-gay--editorial positions are widely known. While unfortunate, the newspaper’s decision should not surprise anyone." The conservative newspaper responded with a statement saying that they have never put homosexual marriages in their newspaper and, "It would be hypocritical of us to do so, given our belief that marriage is and needs to remain a social and civil structure between men and women."

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

RE: Finally, an end to don't ask, don't tell

     In response to The Record's recent editorial, It states there is soon to be an end to the Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) policy. Homosexuals should have the right to do whatever they so choose because they are people too. By removing this policy, this gives homosexuals the right to say what they want and be free while in the army or military, and not have to keep it such a secret that it can lose you a position in the military. This is the right thing to do and it will be a big step that will give possibly more people to the millitary, as they now can accept more homosexuals into their army. Furthermore, homosexual people are not attracted to every single person  they see, they have limits and taking them out of the army just because they are gay is severley unconstitutional.
     In a Washington Post article, Christian Berle states, "No longer will our military be compelled to discharge service members with valuable skills and experience because of an archaic policy mandating irrational discrimination." I support this one hundred percent because the military cannot afford to discharge such valuble members just because they are attracted to men rather than women.
     A reasoning to some that support the DADT policy is that they say a homosexual man is attracted to another man, then he will save him over a person that he is not attracted to. With the training a military member obtains, this should not be the case because all members are trained equally. Even so, the military should not discriminate gays only. If two bestfriends are stationed in the same area they will rather save each other than another member of their station, in that case the military should ban best friends too, but that does not happen.
    I disagree one-hundred percent with the DADT policy and it should be lifted immediatly.